“The history of science is the real history of mankind” In this striking epigram, a nineteenth-century writer links science with its background. Like most epigrams, its power lies in emphasizing by contrast an aspect of truth which may be easily overlooked. In this case, it is easy to overlook the relations between science and mankind, and to treat the former as some abstract third party, which can sometimes be praised for its beneficial influences, but frequently and conveniently blamed for the horrors of war. Science and mankind cannot be divorced from time to time at men’s convenience. Yet we have seen that, in spite of countless opportunities of improvement, the opening years of the present period of civilization have been dominated by international conflict. Is this the inevitable result of the progress of science or does the fault lie elsewhere? Which of the following is/are emphatically conveyed by the author of the passage? 1. Without science, mankind could not have continued to exist till today. 2. It is the science that will ultimately determine the destiny of mankind. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
For election to the Lok Sabha, a nomination paper can be filed by
Miscellaneous · Easy
In a month if the seventh day is three days earlier than Saturday,then the nineteenth day of the month will be a
Miscellaneous · Easy
Which among the following events happened earliest ?
Miscellaneous · Easy
An 80-litre solution of alcohol and water has 75% alcohol. How much water (in litres) must be added to bring down the concentration of alcohol to 60%?
Miscellaneous · Easy