Modern History Prelims Question

After Gandhi’s arrest (March 1922), there was disintegration, disorganisation and demoralisation among nationalist ranks.
A debate started among Congressmen on what to do during the transition period, i.e., the passive phase of the movement.
One section, led by C.R. Das, Motilal Nehru and Ajmal Khan wanted an end to the boycott of Legislative Councils, so that the nationalists could enter them to expose the basic weaknesses of these Assemblies and use these Councils as an arena of political struggle to arouse popular enthusiasm.
They wanted, in other words, to ‘end or mend’ these Councils, i.e., if the government did not respond to the nationalists’ demands, then they would obstruct the working of these Councils.
Those advocating entry into Legislative Councils came to be known as the ‘Swarajists’, while the other school of thought, led by C. Rajagopalachari, Vallabhbhai Patel, Rajendra Prasad and M.A. Ansari came to be known as the ‘No-changers’.
The ‘No-changers’ opposed Council entry, advocated concentration on constructive work, and continuation of Boycott and Non-cooperation, and quiet preparation for resumption of the suspended Civil Disobedience Programme.
The differences over the question of council entry between the two schools of thought resulted in the defeat of the Swarajists’ proposal of ‘ending or mending’ the Councils at the Gaya session of the Congress (December 1922).
C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru resigned from the presidentship and secretaryship, respectively, of the Congress and announced the formation of the Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party or simply Swarajist Party, with C.R. Das as the president and Motilal Nehru as one of the secretaries.

After Gandhi’s arrest (March 1922), there was disintegration, disorganisation and demoralisation among nationalist ranks.
A debate started among Congressmen on what to do during the transition period, i.e., the passive phase of the movement.
One section, led by C.R. Das, Motilal Nehru and Ajmal Khan wanted an end to the boycott of Legislative Councils, so that the nationalists could enter them to expose the basic weaknesses of these Assemblies and use these Councils as an arena of political struggle to arouse popular enthusiasm.
They wanted, in other words, to ‘end or mend’ these Councils, i.e., if the government did not respond to the nationalists’ demands, then they would obstruct the working of these Councils.
Those advocating entry into Legislative Councils came to be known as the ‘Swarajists’, while the other school of thought, led by C. Rajagopalachari, Vallabhbhai Patel, Rajendra Prasad and M.A. Ansari came to be known as the ‘No-changers’.
The ‘No-changers’ opposed Council entry, advocated concentration on constructive work, and continuation of Boycott and Non-cooperation, and quiet preparation for resumption of the suspended Civil Disobedience Programme.
The differences over the question of council entry between the two schools of thought resulted in the defeat of the Swarajists’ proposal of ‘ending or mending’ the Councils at the Gaya session of the Congress (December 1922).
C.R. Das and Motilal Nehru resigned from the presidentship and secretaryship, respectively, of the Congress and announced the formation of the Congress-Khilafat Swarajya Party or simply Swarajist Party, with C.R. Das as the president and Motilal Nehru as one of the secretaries.

Options

Explanation

Share

Related prelims questions

Options

Explanation

Share

Related prelims questions