A Statement followed by Conclusion-I and Conclusion-II is given below. You have to take the Statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all Conclusions and then decide which of the given Conclusion(s) logically follows/follow from the Statement, disregarding the commonly known facts. Statement: Some radios are mobiles. All mobiles are computers. Some computers are watches. Conclusion-I: Certainly some radios are watches. Conclusion-II: Certainly some mobiles are watches. Which one of the following is correct?

Based on the statements provided, Conclusion-I definitely does not follow from the passages. However, Conclusion-II also does not follow. Therefore, neither of the conclusions follows from the passages. Passage-1 talks about the historical context of exploration, highlighting the pursuit of resources as the primary motivation rather than science or curiosity. However, it doesn't mention anything about the negative consequences of this pursuit, which is essential for drawing Conclusion-I. Similarly, while the passage emphasizes resource extraction as the driver for opening frontiers, it doesn't discuss any potential conflicts arising from this, which is necessary for drawing Conclusion-II. Therefore, both conclusions are invalid based on the information provided in the passage.